Ohh Word.com
16May/130

Official: NTSB proposes lowering blood alcohol limit on drunk driving laws

Posted by Autoblog.com

Filed under: ,



In an effort to reduce the number of alcohol-impaired driving crashes, the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) has released a set of recommendations, 19 in total, calling for more stringent laws and enforcement. "Most Americans think that we've solved the problem of impaired driving, but in fact, it's still a national epidemic," NTSB Chairman Deborah A.P. Hersman said. "On average, every hour one person is killed and 20 more are injured."

The most controversial of the recommendations has to do with the blood-alcohol level (BAC) that consitutes being legally drunk behind the wheel. As of today, all states consider the BAC threshold to be a limit of 0.08, but the NTSB is calling for it to be lowered to 0.05 (the agency points out that over 100 countries on six continents have BAC limits set at 0.05 or lower). The NTSB estimates that nearly 1,000 lives would be saved by the change.

In other recommendations, the NTSB has called for police to use passive alcohol sensors to help better detect alcohol vapor in the ambient environment, and it is suggesting giving authorities the power to immediately suspend or revoke driver's licenses at the time of DWI. It also maintains that states should employ measures to improve interlock compliance. To read the rest, check out the full press release below.

Continue reading NTSB proposes lowering blood alcohol limit on drunk driving laws

NTSB proposes lowering blood alcohol limit on drunk driving laws originally appeared on Autoblog on Thu, 16 May 2013 08:00:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink | Email this | Comments
24Apr/130

BACTrack is the “quantified self” app for boozers

Posted by Pandodaily.com

barney_drunk

The quantified self movement, with its various data-collecting bracelets and corresponding apps, is meant to help people track their exercise, sleep and eating habits without having to remember to write it all down.

The latest entrant to the field, iPhone breathalyzer BACTrack, does that for people who might not remember what they should write down. This is your quantified drinking self.

$149.99 buys a breathalyzer unit the size of a beeper. Through a corresponding iPhone app, which communicates with the unit via bluetooth, your levels of drunkenness now have an archive.

mobile_0016_small

Retail breathalyzers have been around for ages, and at much lower price points. You can buy a cheapo $15 model at the truck stop or a $50 one at Walgreens. But those aren’t terribly accurate and typically break after a handful of blows. BACTrack is expensive, the company says, because it uses fuel cell technology, the technology used by professional-grade police models. The others use semi-conductors. It’s not clear what Indiegogo hit Breathometer will use. That product, which I hope to review s well, will cost $20 and is not available until 2014.

I don’t have to explain why one would want such a device. Drinking with a breathalyzer is equal parts serious self-awareness and hilarious novelty. Having a record of it on your iPhone is that much more of an incentive. However, when you are drinking with a breathalyzer, the temptation to push its boundaries is just too rich. And when you’re in a vodka-soaked haze, each additional drink counts as “research,” of course. “For work.”

In other words, that third martini last night was a bad idea.

Sometime after midnight, a friend told me about Tucker Max’s apparently famous Sushi Pants story, which declares that breathalyzers are “the most destructive invention of the past 50 years” and also “the devil dressed in a transistor.” Thankfully my night never escalated to Tucker Max levels of douchery.

In fact, you might say BACTrack helps its users avoid losing their pants as they vomit sushi in a bush somewhere, by arming them with data. Beyond the basic BAC number, BACTrack’s iOS app relays the context, and a data trail, of one’s imbibing. Benjamin Franklin, tracker of habits and celebrated drinker, would surely approve.

After my first drink, which resulted in a .02 BAC reading, BACTrack told me I was not in a position to drive (the legal limit in most states is .08, but many have “zero tolerance” rules making any impairment above .02 illegal). At .039, I was informed that my reasoning and memory were likely impaired. My inhibitions also may have been lowering, BACTrack said. At peak drunkenness, .162, I was told, simply, “You are visibly intoxicated.” Why yes, BACTrack, yes I am. Here, I would have appreciated a more personal touch even. “You are saying some really dumb shit, Erin.” Or, “It is time for an Irish Goodbye.” Or, “You are likely to leave your tab open.”

The app’s most beneficial piece of information, though, is the “time to sober” chart. When, over the weekend, I blew a two-drink .039 at 10:30, BACTrack calculated I wouldn’t be sober until 1 a.m. And last night — the martini night — I was informed I’d be working booze out of my system until 2 p.m. today. True enough, I blew a .02 at 8 a.m. today.

Fortunately, my morning commute is the walk to the living room couch. This information is particularly useful for anyone whose job requires driving or operating machinery and should probably not stay out until 1 a.m. drinking martinis. They should probably also be already aware of this information, but a reminder at the Moment of Bad Decisions always helps.

However, the BACTrack app wasn’t perfect. The part I was most excited about — visualized charts and graphs mapping my drinking habits — was a bit of a letdown. I was hoping for detailed, beautiful, realtime, interactive visualizations akin to other journal-style apps like Expereal, Foodia or Vizify. Each BACTrack reading can include a photo, notes, and a drink tag, creating a bit of a drinking journal (friends’ BAC scores go to a separate section). Given the prevalence of drinking culture in the US, for better or for worse, this app has plenty of social sharing (and shaming) potential, too, with one-click Facebook and Twitter functionality. The notes/photos/drink tags also work for beer nerds, if they aren’t already using iHops, Beer Cloud, Beer Universe, Beer Stat, or Pintley or Happy Houred.

But, aside from the breathalyzer itself, the app’s the user interface for viewing your drinking history was very difficult (sometimes downright impossible) to navigate. Luckily an app, unlike a piece of hardware, can be improved over time. Here, I’m willing to forgive BACTrack, especially since it got the difficult part — the readings — right.

Erin Griffith

erin
Erin Griffith covers New York startups for PandoDaily. She's worked as staff writer for Adweek and a private equity blogger for peHUB. Her writing has appeared in VCJ, Time Out New YorkHuffington Post, FT.com, and BUST. She plays keyboard in a band called Team Genius and Tweets as @Eringriffith.

    


20Feb/130

Video: This is what driving totally stoned on marijuana looks like

Posted by Autoblog.com

Filed under: , ,

CNN Driving Stoned - video screencap

With multiple states legalizing marijuana, government agencies are scrambling to research the effect of the drug on drivers. CNN recently took a look at operating a motor vehicle under the influence of pot by subjecting three users in Washington state to a little driving test with the help of a local sheriff's department. The results are a little surprising, with even casual smokers able to safely operate a car with up to five times the state's new legal limit in their blood stream. At worst, the smokers were actually more cautious on the course than they were before partaking.

Once the levels increased, however, the story changed dramatically, with two participants showing obvious signs of impairment. Heavy user Addy, meanwhile, continued to perform admirably up until the very last stage of the study. You can check out the full video below for yourself, and remember to keep it off the road, kids.

Continue reading This is what driving totally stoned on marijuana looks like

This is what driving totally stoned on marijuana looks like originally appeared on Autoblog on Wed, 20 Feb 2013 12:45:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink | Email this | Comments
28Jan/130

Report: Ireland could allow "moderately" drunk driving

Posted by Autoblog.com

Filed under: ,



On one side you have Ireland's measures against drunk driving: a maximum allowable blood-alcohol level of .05 percent (the legal limit is .08 in most states in the US), and statistics like the lowered limit and checkpoints having "decreased road deaths by 42 percent in the last four years." On the other side you have councilor Danny Healy-Rae of County Kerry who is worried about some of his elderly constituents being isolated in rural areas: Healy-Rae says that the pub is the only place to socialize in some villages, and without public transport and any way to get home after a few pints, some elder villagers end up staying home every night for fear of losing their licenses.

To address the issue, Healy-Rae has put forth a motion that would allow some Irish to drive after "two or three" drinks - with "some" being limited to certain people in certain out-of-the-way places. He is clear that he doesn't want this thought of as a blanket provision for the entire country, saying "on the roads I'm talking about, you couldn't do any more than 20 or 30 miles per hour and it's not a big deal. I don't see any big issue with it."

The mayor of Kerry does have a big issue with it, questioning how someone can suggest that drinking and driving, by anyone for any reason, is acceptable. Alcohol Action Ireland also takes issue, its chief dousing Healy-Rae's arguments with "Those in rural areas who may be suffering from isolation will not benefit from putting their lives and the lives of the other members of their community at risk by drinking and driving." Healy-Rae's motion was passed in a local council meeting by a vote of five to three, and now he's asking Ireland's Minister for Justice, Alan Shatter, to consider it.

Ireland could allow "moderately" drunk driving originally appeared on Autoblog on Mon, 28 Jan 2013 11:33:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink | Email this | Comments
3Jan/130

Report: Suit claims Utah trooper faked DUI arrests

Posted by Autoblog.com

Filed under: ,

Utah Highway Patrol Corporal Lisa SteedAn officer with the Utah Highway Patrol was relieved of duty after allegations surfaced that she falsely arrested more than 40 people for driving under the influence. The New York Times reports that a lawsuit stemming from the allegations was filed on December 14 in Salt Lake City's District Court. The suit accuses Corporal Lisa Steed of arresting drivers who weren't even drinking. In some cases, those arrested were people who claim they don't actually drink alcohol at all. Robert Sykes, one of the lawyers on the case, says in many cases, his clients were arrested even after passing a sobriety test.

In those cases, the charges were either dropped or reduced, but not until the accused had paid bail, had their vehicles impounded and racked up court fees in excess of $1,000.

According to the report, Steed had been a rising star within the UHP - she was even named trooper of the year in 2007. But she was fired in November amidst allegations of wrongdoing, though she is currently appealing her termination. Greg Skordas, Steed's lawyer, said the allegations were overblown, arguing that most of her arrests had stood up in court. Even so, Davis County attorney Troy Rawlings has said he will dismiss any case where Steed was the primary investigator or witness. Three years ago, a Highway Patrol sergeant reviewed 20 of Steed's marijuana-impairment arrests and found that the drivers had no traces of the drugs in their system.

Suit claims Utah trooper faked DUI arrests originally appeared on Autoblog on Thu, 03 Jan 2013 14:15:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink | Email this | Comments
30Dec/120

Report: New Year’s Day, not St. Patrick’s, most deadly on US roads

Posted by Autoblog.com

Filed under: , ,

2013 parade

Earlier this month, as part of its conclusions to an investigation into wrong-way driving crashes, the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) recommend ignition interlocks for all those convicted of a DUI. That means every first-time offender couldn't start his car until he had satisfied the breathalyzer attached to his ignition. With the nation's deadliest hours for drunk driving approaching, New Year's Day, the American Automobile Association (AAA) has pointed out the dangers of the holiday and voiced support for the NTSB measure.

The AAA says its own study shows that "nearly eight out of ten Americans support requiring ignition interlocks for all convicted DUI offenders, even if it's their first conviction." Mothers Against Drunk Driving (MADD) has put the national rate of repeat DUI offenders at 15 percent, but there's a huge variance: in California nearly eight percent of fatal DUI crashes are repeat offenders and DUI recidivism overall was 24 percent in 2007, whereas in New Mexico in 2011 more than 50 percent of fatal DUI crashes are attributed to repeat offenders. Another stat from MADD is that "The average driver drives drunk 87 times before their first arrest."

There are already 17 states that mandate ignition interlock devices for those convicted of DUI, and the NTSB is asking the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration to speed up research into manufacturer-installed interlock devices. It will probably be a while, if ever, before the federal government or the rest of the country follows the lead of those 17 states, but the real point is this: We've made it past the Mayan Apocalypse, so enjoy the new world and be careful behind the wheel come NYE.

Continue reading New Year's Day, not St. Patrick's, most deadly on US roads

New Year's Day, not St. Patrick's, most deadly on US roads originally appeared on Autoblog on Sun, 30 Dec 2012 16:58:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink | Email this | Comments
12Dec/120

Video: Participant claims Fox News Denver rigged marijuana driving test results

Posted by Autoblog.com

Filed under: , , ,

KDVR Fox News 31 report on marijuana influence - video screencap

In May of this year, KDVR, Fox News 31 of Denver, Colorado aired a segment in which it tested the effects of marijuana on drivers. At the time of the story, Colorado lawmakers narrowly voted down a law that would have made it illegal to drive with more than five nanograms per milliliter of the drug in your system. So, to determine the effects of driving under the influence of marijuana, the local Fox affiliate gathered up several volunteers, with ages ranging from early-20's to mid-60's, and asked them to hop into a driving simulator after smoking pot. Once participant was not convinced of the news station's objectivity.

Max Montrose was one of the younger volunteers, and he was skeptical about the study, so he brought a hidden camera with him. Following the experiment, he posted a video to YouTube last week, cutting in clips of the new story with his own footage of the test. In one hidden camera clip, Montrose gets a camera operator to admit that the test isn't really that applicable, as well as other volunteers pointing out that the simulator was designed for the CDL test, designed for large semi trucks. He also contends that another vehicle in the simulator acted erratically and crashed into him in the course of his test.

The whole video seemed very damning on its surface, but KDVR has shot back, providing context to many of the issues raised by Montrose. The station explains that the test was conducted by a third party, and though the test was in a CDL facility, the simulator was set for a four-door SUV, a vehicle that would have been familiar for many drivers. Furthermore, the station interviewed a phlebotomist, who stated that effects are different from person to person, and several volunteers passed the test even though under the influence.

The KDVR response basically states that Montrose may have had biased motives from the start of the study, which is a claim that Montrose makes of the privately owned Fox affiliate. The original news report is not very damning for marijuana users, meanwhile Montrose even admits that he "would never advocate in a million years anyone to drive intoxicated on anything for any reason." So, no real conclusions are drawn in the matter, but just like the phlebotomist said of marijuana, this news story apparently affects each individual differently. See the now-viral video for yourself by scrolling below, and draw your own conclusions.

Continue reading Participant claims Fox News Denver rigged marijuana driving test results

Participant claims Fox News Denver rigged marijuana driving test results originally appeared on Autoblog on Wed, 12 Dec 2012 12:33:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink | Email this | Comments